Skip to content

Comment on 339 Bytes of Responsive CSSparent

Comments

Yep ... the first thing I did was to see if he was "eating his own dog-food". As an aside, I'd recommend against putting the linked site on a projector at work (or at least look at it first to determine whether it fits your organization's culture).

I think most projectors would have a problem displaying the text in a readable way - the line width is so fine

I'd recommend against putting the linked site on a projector at work

Is it because of the linked site?

@purerandomnesss OP here. Copied that from http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/

I think, I should probably change the text.

Yes ... I didn't even think about the fact that "linked site" is ambiguous in this case. I wonder if you can play the "six degrees of separation" game (Kevin Bacon) with web-sites. How many links do you need to follow to get from any random site to any other? If the web is fully connected, then "linked site" is fully ambiguous!

Yes, definitely. He's talking about [0]. It's really unprofessional (which is a pity because it's impressive!)

[0] - https://blog.koley.in/baserock/

It's because of the linked example in OP's link: https://blog.koley.in/baserock/

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.