Perhaps I'm missing something, but it seems they artificially selected for single-celled organisms that are sticky and clump together (thus making them -- as a group -- too large to be eaten.)
As the 'stickiness' doesn't really pose a disadvantage to the single-celled organism, the trait persists even after the predator is removed.
In short, can a collection of 'stickier-than-normal' single-celled organisms truly be referred to as a multicellular organism? Aren't they stretching the definition of multicellular? Each of the units, after all, reproduces on its own and there is no differentiation.
Comments
Perhaps I'm missing something, but it seems they artificially selected for single-celled organisms that are sticky and clump together (thus making them -- as a group -- too large to be eaten.)
As the 'stickiness' doesn't really pose a disadvantage to the single-celled organism, the trait persists even after the predator is removed.
In short, can a collection of 'stickier-than-normal' single-celled organisms truly be referred to as a multicellular organism? Aren't they stretching the definition of multicellular? Each of the units, after all, reproduces on its own and there is no differentiation.