Skip to content

Comment on Why Arc is bad for exploratory programmingparent

Comments

I don't see how this relates to the original argument. It doesn't help explain you can or can't say why something isn't true. And anyway, it wouldn't be easier to respond "why is the color of the programmer's shirt important ...?" than its negation.

I think that's kindof the point... it's easier to ask the affirmative form then the negative, ie it's easier to prove then disprove.

Anyways, this meta-discussion has gone long enough anyways. I'm having too hard a time following it. Can't we go back arc and exploratory languages, please? :)

You are right, we are very off topic now :) back to Arc.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.