> Badger provides better performance than RocksDB, both in terms of reads and writes.

It's not that simple. It's never that simple.

Yeah. The post that is linked[0] within that quote has a "Benchmarks" section, but it looks like they're either 100% reads or 100% writes. Most real workloads aren't like that.

[0] https://blog.dgraph.io/post/badger/#benchmarks