Comment on Why Is Uranus the Only Planet Without Interesting Features on It?parentComments−detaro7yThe article doesn't say it isn't interesting (nor does the title), and actually says it has nice swirling clouds now. (The comments here really are something else...)−swasheck7yCame for the puerile, stayed for the pedantry.−stcredzero7yWhat of the puerile pedantry and the pedantic puerility?−NelsonMinar7yHN users feel no requirement to read an article before commenting on it.−jgamman7y2 sentences? i don't even bother finishing the entire comment either.−colejohnson667yThat’s not limited to HN−duxup7yThe title certainly implies it doesn't have interesting features.−detaro7y"Features on it", as in "visible things", not "characteristics of it".−dwaltrip7yHN doesn't like clickbait titles.−mweibelOP7ywas unsure whether I should change the title to something less clickbaity or not. It's the article's original title after all..
Comments
The article doesn't say it isn't interesting (nor does the title), and actually says it has nice swirling clouds now. (The comments here really are something else...)
Came for the puerile, stayed for the pedantry.
What of the puerile pedantry and the pedantic puerility?
HN users feel no requirement to read an article before commenting on it.
That’s not limited to HN
The title certainly implies it doesn't have interesting features.
"Features on it", as in "visible things", not "characteristics of it".
HN doesn't like clickbait titles.
was unsure whether I should change the title to something less clickbaity or not. It's the article's original title after all..