Comment on New Limits on PatentsComments−ced19y"ordinary innovation", "a common sense standard", "dramatically broadened the standard of obviousness"Surreal. I looked for related articles, and I found:Court cases threaten weaker patents and could hinder technological innovation, http://www.thejournalnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070501/BUSINESS01/705010325/1066/BUSINESS01Supreme Court ruling could squeeze Big Pharma, http://money.cnn.com/2007/05/01/news/companies/patent/?postversion=2007050209Supreme Court Patent Ruling Wont Affect Us, [patent holder] DataTreasury Says, http://www.digitaltransactions.net/newsstory.cfm?newsid=1343I'd say that anything that is that vague and imprecise is a net loss for us. It empowers lawyers to find creative interpretations, and thus, it helps big cos.
Comments
"ordinary innovation", "a common sense standard", "dramatically broadened the standard of obviousness"
Surreal. I looked for related articles, and I found:
Court cases threaten weaker patents and could hinder technological innovation, http://www.thejournalnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070501/BUSINESS01/705010325/1066/BUSINESS01
Supreme Court ruling could squeeze Big Pharma, http://money.cnn.com/2007/05/01/news/companies/patent/?postversion=2007050209
Supreme Court Patent Ruling Wont Affect Us, [patent holder] DataTreasury Says, http://www.digitaltransactions.net/newsstory.cfm?newsid=1343
I'd say that anything that is that vague and imprecise is a net loss for us. It empowers lawyers to find creative interpretations, and thus, it helps big cos.