Instead of looking at the headline read the article. It’s clearly about the lack of pricing power for labor. The author is decrying the absence of pricing power on the part of labor so responding with a suggestion to further erode that pricing power without providing any evidence that this action would help labor is not constructive. Unless your point is that emoloyers have too little pricing power and we need to correct the mechanisms that take away their power.
Comments
Instead of looking at the headline read the article. It’s clearly about the lack of pricing power for labor. The author is decrying the absence of pricing power on the part of labor so responding with a suggestion to further erode that pricing power without providing any evidence that this action would help labor is not constructive. Unless your point is that emoloyers have too little pricing power and we need to correct the mechanisms that take away their power.