Skip to content

Comment on Evolution of Emacs Lisp [pdf]parent

Comments

I think the issue is not that there are missing features, it is that there are too many features. Elisp would benefit a lot from pruning and standardization of its many, many, many builtins.

This is a very hard problem to recover from, because backwards compatibility is so important for something like Emacs. Breaking old versions would be completely unacceptable, which makes it very difficult to remove any features.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.