Supposedly, that's why they paid "largest penalty ever assessed against a financial services firm in the history of the S.E.C." ($550 million). Unfortunately, I find it hard to believe that's anywhere near enough to dissuade them from doing the same next time.
Comments
All bigger institutions certainly do. I have worked for quite a few.
And never mind those situations where GS etc were playing both sides, advising one side to buy, others to sell.
They knew through sheer logic that one of these positions was by deduction not tenable.
But they went for it anyway, collecting commissions on both sides.
Supposedly, that's why they paid "largest penalty ever assessed against a financial services firm in the history of the S.E.C." ($550 million). Unfortunately, I find it hard to believe that's anywhere near enough to dissuade them from doing the same next time.