What a lot of it boils down to is that Bloomberg appears to have taken Mr. Fitzpatrick's hypotheses and speculation about the Supermicro implant, and included them in their article as if they were confirmed facts. If this is indeed the case, it calls the entire article into question.
Comments
Right before that:
Am I missing something? What's specifically the criticism about the pictures here, that they aren't literally what the alleged devices look like?
What a lot of it boils down to is that Bloomberg appears to have taken Mr. Fitzpatrick's hypotheses and speculation about the Supermicro implant, and included them in their article as if they were confirmed facts. If this is indeed the case, it calls the entire article into question.