Comment on Twitter Said To Be Abandoning Ruby on RailsComments−andr18yev: FWIW: Twitter currently has no plans to abandon RoR. Lots of our code is not in RoR, already, though. Maybe that's why people are confused.http://twitter.com/ev/statuses/801530348(Ironically, Twitter was down when I first tried to get the URL for this.)−handelaar18yCurrently: 500 Internal Server Error.(With an HTTP Status header being dumped to the screen instead of, you know, sent as a header.)−Hexstream18yDo you obsessively check the headers for proper status codes whenever you land on a page? I'm always amazed how people find out header problems like this just by browsing.−eggnet18yHe probably has firebug.
Comments
ev: FWIW: Twitter currently has no plans to abandon RoR. Lots of our code is not in RoR, already, though. Maybe that's why people are confused.
http://twitter.com/ev/statuses/801530348
(Ironically, Twitter was down when I first tried to get the URL for this.)
Currently: 500 Internal Server Error.
(With an HTTP Status header being dumped to the screen instead of, you know, sent as a header.)
Do you obsessively check the headers for proper status codes whenever you land on a page? I'm always amazed how people find out header problems like this just by browsing.
He probably has firebug.