As it stands, all metrics include a hidden “quality of OpenStreetMap data” feature that may explain significant fractions of the significance of features.
So, I think they should try to compensate for that. How? I wouldn’t know.
It may be more interesting to work in the other direction, where the comparison with the economic data is used to estimate the quality of the OSM data.
Comments
As it stands, all metrics include a hidden “quality of OpenStreetMap data” feature that may explain significant fractions of the significance of features.
So, I think they should try to compensate for that. How? I wouldn’t know.
It may be more interesting to work in the other direction, where the comparison with the economic data is used to estimate the quality of the OSM data.