Skip to content

Comment on An Open Challenge to Silicon Valleyparent

Comments

It is funny how now hedge funds and bankers take all the blame, even though millions of 'common people' speculated recklessly in real estate and picked up up enormous debts without any second thought.

The Fed has tried to avoid post-2000 recession and to stimulate general consumption by keeping low interest rates (and not objecting to the tax cuts). This was obviously politically motivated and not very smart as we now see. It did result in a credit bubble. But to claim that it was done to benefit a few 'well-connected' financiers is populism to my opinion. It was done to avoid discontent among people. To appease the masses, so to say...

Interestingly, it is the capitalists who are suffering now, as their equity is eroded by inflation, weak dollar and the bear stock market. The average Joe just defaults on his debts and walks away from his 3 year old house. His creditors take the loss. So it is actually a wealth transfer from the rich to the poor.

>it is the capitalists who are suffering now

lol

1gor, you're douching up this thread.

That's fake money. As Marc Andreesen pointed out, U.S. taxpayers paid the Bear Stearns CEO $60M in cash, directly:

http://blog.pmarca.com/2008/03/congratulations.html

PEACE

Hm... I though 'fake money' had something to do with social network valuations... If so, Marc indeed should know everything about that.

Anyway, I just wanted to say a word in defence of poor hedge fund managers. Some members of this forum will get rich enough to use their services (or become one of them -- like Peter Thiel). Recycling populist cliches about evil bankers and globalisation is soo like... Reddit? ;)

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.