Comment on Amazon Aurora ServerlessComments−paulddraper8yAWS, why not PostgreSQL?The bare minimum cost for Aurora PostgreSQL is $200/month. Aurora MySQL is an order of magnitude less.Why not PostgreSQL?−ranman8yIt's on the way.−paulddraper8yThat's good to hear.Because Aurora PostgreSQL has already behind MySQL for years. Glad to hear this isn't a perpetual condition.
Comments
AWS, why not PostgreSQL?
The bare minimum cost for Aurora PostgreSQL is $200/month. Aurora MySQL is an order of magnitude less.
Why not PostgreSQL?
It's on the way.
That's good to hear.
Because Aurora PostgreSQL has already behind MySQL for years. Glad to hear this isn't a perpetual condition.