I think the that the virulent all-or-nothing Bayesian vs. frequentist debates are really more from earlier decades. These days most people are open to using techniques from both camps and are more interested in solving problems than being philosophically "pure".
Comments
I think the that the virulent all-or-nothing Bayesian vs. frequentist debates are really more from earlier decades. These days most people are open to using techniques from both camps and are more interested in solving problems than being philosophically "pure".