I have found that Sass makes managing large amounts of CSS really easy. It's honestly probably more useful to me than Haml itself. But both of those were the 'killer app' of rails for me personally. I can write html and css, but haml and sass are just so much more succinct and DRY.
Ditto for me. I've never enjoyed implementing a design (I much prefer programming), but it's usually cheaper/easier to have someone mock something up in photoshop for me to implement than have have the designer implement a template as well.
Haml & Sass make the process so much less painful.
Comments
I have found that Sass makes managing large amounts of CSS really easy. It's honestly probably more useful to me than Haml itself. But both of those were the 'killer app' of rails for me personally. I can write html and css, but haml and sass are just so much more succinct and DRY.
Ditto for me. I've never enjoyed implementing a design (I much prefer programming), but it's usually cheaper/easier to have someone mock something up in photoshop for me to implement than have have the designer implement a template as well.
Haml & Sass make the process so much less painful.
Python and Haskell have CleverCSS to do the same.