Skip to content

Comment on What the Crypto Community Should Learn from GitHub's Acquisition

Comments

This happens because `distributed < distributed + centralized` nearly always.

For example, git is great, but git plus an (optional) issue tracker has more value, so that's what people use.

Coincidentally (or perhaps causally?), FOSS < FOSS + closed source.

The only way I can see this changing is if the distributed (or free or open-source) benefits of the system fail early and painfully when centralized (or paywalled or close-sourced). I can't think of any such systems off the top of my head.

Yeah, sometimes I worry this pattern is inevitable as well. At the very least, though, I'd like to see us paying attention to the issue this go-around with crypto/blockchain

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.