Comment on Elm at Pacific Health DynamicsparentComments−Guthur8yIt's also possible that you can move faster with a dynamically type checked language.I would be of the opinion that it is faster because if static compilation was a free lunch there would be no question−kod8yIf static compilation was a free lunch AND people were rational, which they are not, there would be no question.I definitely move faster in decent statically typed languages, but I did invest time in learning.−jxxcarlson8yYes, move faster, then pay the price later when stuff is broken and hard to fix.
Comments
It's also possible that you can move faster with a dynamically type checked language.
I would be of the opinion that it is faster because if static compilation was a free lunch there would be no question
If static compilation was a free lunch AND people were rational, which they are not, there would be no question.
I definitely move faster in decent statically typed languages, but I did invest time in learning.
Yes, move faster, then pay the price later when stuff is broken and hard to fix.