Skip to content

Comment on Sources say the secretive Zuma satellite was lost by SpaceX

Comments

How exactly does likely loss and destruction of payload translate into "performed nominally"? Is that like "stable genius"?

It's possible that the launch vehicle performed nominally but the payload had its own propulsion or attitude control, which failed in some manner and prevented the payload from achieving orbit.

Maybe they mean the lower stage performed normally?

the first stage of the rocket behaved nominally enough such that it was able to safely return to Earth and make a land-based landing along the Florida coast.
According to one source, the payload fell back to Earth along with the spent upper stage of the Falcon 9 rocket.
AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.