> If it helps 10% of homeless get off the street, that could be a huge victory in and of itself.
Or, it could be a huge disaster. It depends on the costs.
> Yes, I have, which is why I said it wasn't a magic bullet, but something that should be given more of a shot.
Feel free. As the article points out, the experiment doesn't cost much, so you can do it and tell us how it went. It's <$400/month and it's tax deductible.
What? You're not willing to spend your money to prove your arguments? Then why should I spend mine? (And yes, I pay a lot more than $400/month in taxes.)
Comments
> If it helps 10% of homeless get off the street, that could be a huge victory in and of itself.
Or, it could be a huge disaster. It depends on the costs.
> Yes, I have, which is why I said it wasn't a magic bullet, but something that should be given more of a shot.
Feel free. As the article points out, the experiment doesn't cost much, so you can do it and tell us how it went. It's <$400/month and it's tax deductible.
What? You're not willing to spend your money to prove your arguments? Then why should I spend mine? (And yes, I pay a lot more than $400/month in taxes.)