Horrendous... each detail is more chilling than the last, culminating in the immersion in the pool of those two poor bastards. Hell indeed! The USSR and Russia had/have a horrendous safety record in all NBC domains, anthrax releases, nuclear disasters, poisoning with Polonium.. it’s almost a bad joke.
Not to mention Chernobyl! Common themes are massive systemic fuckups and attempts to cover up making it all worse. Even without NBC it’s the same pattern, turning bad into worse.
Underfunded mandates + constant military competition + PR-driven secrecy
It's worth remembering these were the other side of the "beat the Soviet Union by making it economically unsustainable to maintain military parity" course charted in the late 70s & 80s.
Ultimately a successful strategy, but cases like this (less so Chernobyl) can't be ignored as a consequence.
Rest assured, the Soviet government did not need any pressure from the outside to create its own version of hell on earth. If you doubt this, just read the Gulag Archipel (amongst others). The problems seen here do not relate to any western policies, they stem from the ineptitude of the Soviet government and pre-date any western attempt to topple the latter by "forcing" them to increase military spending:
"The repository was constructed in the early 1960s
by construction brigade soldiers from central Asian
and Caucasian republics. Many did not have professional
construction training, and some could not speak the
Russian language."
If the accident was in 1982, I don't think attributing it solely to events at its construction in the 1960s is fair.
Construction issues could have been recognize and addressed in any of the intervening ~20 years.
And yes, chasing parity with the US did lead to unsustainable Soviet military GDP allocations, ultimately empowering Gorbachev with an economically- rather than ideologically-derived mandate and thus leading to the dissolution of the Soviet Union.
It's a fair argument as to whether or not this was intentionally engineered, but it's a fact that the Soviets spent roughly twice as much of their GDP on their military, and that the Soviet Union eventually collapsed for economic reasons.
From what I have read, that US policy started with Reagan, who was elected president in 1981. And the Soviets, as communists, were quite clear their long-term objective was to communize the whole world.
Comments
Horrendous... each detail is more chilling than the last, culminating in the immersion in the pool of those two poor bastards. Hell indeed! The USSR and Russia had/have a horrendous safety record in all NBC domains, anthrax releases, nuclear disasters, poisoning with Polonium.. it’s almost a bad joke.
Edit: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sverdlovsk_anthrax_leak
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Soviet_nuclear_false_al...
Not to mention Chernobyl! Common themes are massive systemic fuckups and attempts to cover up making it all worse. Even without NBC it’s the same pattern, turning bad into worse.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrei_Chikatilo
Underfunded mandates + constant military competition + PR-driven secrecy
It's worth remembering these were the other side of the "beat the Soviet Union by making it economically unsustainable to maintain military parity" course charted in the late 70s & 80s.
Ultimately a successful strategy, but cases like this (less so Chernobyl) can't be ignored as a consequence.
Rest assured, the Soviet government did not need any pressure from the outside to create its own version of hell on earth. If you doubt this, just read the Gulag Archipel (amongst others). The problems seen here do not relate to any western policies, they stem from the ineptitude of the Soviet government and pre-date any western attempt to topple the latter by "forcing" them to increase military spending:
If the accident was in 1982, I don't think attributing it solely to events at its construction in the 1960s is fair.
Construction issues could have been recognize and addressed in any of the intervening ~20 years.
And yes, chasing parity with the US did lead to unsustainable Soviet military GDP allocations, ultimately empowering Gorbachev with an economically- rather than ideologically-derived mandate and thus leading to the dissolution of the Soviet Union.
It's a fair argument as to whether or not this was intentionally engineered, but it's a fact that the Soviets spent roughly twice as much of their GDP on their military, and that the Soviet Union eventually collapsed for economic reasons.
Soviet military spending by year: https://nintil.com/2016/05/31/the-soviet-union-military-spen...
Reallocation example under Gorbachev: http://www.nytimes.com/1989/05/31/world/soviet-military-budg...
From what I have read, that US policy started with Reagan, who was elected president in 1981. And the Soviets, as communists, were quite clear their long-term objective was to communize the whole world.
See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyshtym_disaster
And a nice longform article about it: https://www.damninteresting.com/in-soviet-russia-lake-contam...