If Olin's small numbers are skewed by a few founder types moreso than the large numbers of Stanford, and you wanted to be a founder type, wouldn't you stand a chance of learning more from your peers by going to Olin?

I don't see why people are arguing that selectivity and small size invalidate the better quality of Olin's education. I learned as much from my peers as from my teachers, not to mention the motivation of peer competition.