Skip to content

Comment on “This project violates the MIT license of Gemstash”

Comments

What would you call what actually happened here? Whitelabeling? It doesn't appear to be a license violation since no code from the other project is included here, but I presume this repo basically wraps Gemstash's functionality, and doesn't really mention (outside of the code itself) that that is what it is doing.

It may not be a license violation, but "Google Cloud Gemserver", if it is functionally similar to Gemstash's own functionality, sounds like a rebranding, which... feels uncomfortable?

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.