Comment on “This project violates the MIT license of Gemstash”parentComments−bhhaskin9yI don't think you need to include the MIT license if the source code is not included.−steveklabnik9yThe above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.There's no distinction between source and binary code.−mikeash9yBut there is a distinction between redistributing a work and merely referencing it. It doesn't look like this repository actually copies anything from the other, and just listing the other one as a dependency doesn't require including the license.
Comments
I don't think you need to include the MIT license if the source code is not included.
There's no distinction between source and binary code.
But there is a distinction between redistributing a work and merely referencing it. It doesn't look like this repository actually copies anything from the other, and just listing the other one as a dependency doesn't require including the license.