The author of Gemstash is clearly trying to wring as much outrage from this as he possibly can. This is blatantly NOT a fork, it's a wrapper. On Twitter he's stepped down from the "fork" accusation and downgraded it to "he used our README", but seems to be enjoying the attention too much to amend his original complaint.
Comments
The author of Gemstash is clearly trying to wring as much outrage from this as he possibly can. This is blatantly NOT a fork, it's a wrapper. On Twitter he's stepped down from the "fork" accusation and downgraded it to "he used our README", but seems to be enjoying the attention too much to amend his original complaint.
The READMEs are very different
I agree. The guy's accusation doesn't make sense on a number of levels. I'm just quoting him, not endorsing him: https://twitter.com/indirect/status/900461424865980416
And finally he confesses that there is nothing wrong!
https://twitter.com/indirect/status/900525357459161088