So, speaking for Google (for once):
We're on it (and about to post a response), but a number of us have looked at this, and having trouble finding any actual code in common between the repos at all (let alone any where the license was changed).
I can find parts that depend on the gemstash project being installed, but nothing that appears to actually have been taken from the gemstash project .
I'd someone here sees some, i'd really appreciate letting us know (here, or email me at dannyb@google) so we can go fix it.
Nothing to find as far as i can see. All that's done is import a gem like anyone would who's project who depends on an external gem. Mr. Indirect seems to have had a bad day, take it easy :)]
Edit: Seems more just a google criticaster https://indirect.tumblr.com/post/164152747613/so-ive-been-th...
As an update looks like he thinks he was wrong.
As Max said, mistakes happen, and most people are not very willing to publicly admit when they make them, so I'm generally very supportive of anyone who is willing to do that move on.
Comments
So, speaking for Google (for once): We're on it (and about to post a response), but a number of us have looked at this, and having trouble finding any actual code in common between the repos at all (let alone any where the license was changed).
I can find parts that depend on the gemstash project being installed, but nothing that appears to actually have been taken from the gemstash project .
I'd someone here sees some, i'd really appreciate letting us know (here, or email me at dannyb@google) so we can go fix it.
Nothing to find as far as i can see. All that's done is import a gem like anyone would who's project who depends on an external gem. Mr. Indirect seems to have had a bad day, take it easy :)] Edit: Seems more just a google criticaster https://indirect.tumblr.com/post/164152747613/so-ive-been-th...
That's not the same @indirect.
https://github.com/indirect links to http://arko.net/, which links to http://indirect.tumblr.com/.
Ah, I stand corrected, looks like the blog belongs to him, but the article itself was written by someone else (@williampietri).
It looks like @indirect has admitted he made a mistake, apologized, and closed the issue:
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-gemserve...
As an update looks like he thinks he was wrong. As Max said, mistakes happen, and most people are not very willing to publicly admit when they make them, so I'm generally very supportive of anyone who is willing to do that move on.
I mean it's a stretch, but most of the lines in the .gitignore from the first commit, compared with Gemstash now, are similar.
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-gemserve... https://github.com/bundler/gemstash/blob/master/.gitignore
I hope Google can afford a good lawyer!
Those are some pretty standard ignore lines for a Ruby project. Probably both taken from a common template.