Skip to content

Comment on Diaspora version 0.7.0.0 releasedparent

Comments

I'm only peripherally attached (I've got a ... long-dormant Diaspora account), but there are a number of semi-inter-related open-social projects, which talk to various extents. "The Fediverse" includes a few of those, and I think it has bridges/gateways to Diaspora.

Frendica is another, I think, related protocol.

The problem generally is that the communities are small, diversified, hosting is a hurdle for virtually anyone, and individual instances can be finicky.

(On Mastodon -- a different technology entirely, but similar in concept -- I have two accounts on different instances, and since April have found that one or the other has been down, unavailable, or technically unusable for up to weeks at a time.)

Should some nucleating group decide that they were going all-in on Diasapora (or a compatible tech), that might make a difference. Meantime, everything seems stuck in slow-start mode.

Cool. I just signed up on Mastadon. Have you tried patchwork yet?

The slow-start mode seems to be default mode for all new social media platforms while FB is dominating the space. I could see a service business rolling Diaspora out on-site to organizations. I think poaching users is fair game and should be perfected across all the platforms. Basically, sharing on FB links that are hosted on a Diaspora instance. So the act of sharing on FB increases exposure for the instance.

I haven't.

https://mammouth.cafe/@dredmorbius

https://mastodon.cloud/@dredmorbius

First is primary, though I hop back and forth a fair bit.

Mastodon instances are actually part of the Fediverse (OStatus)

As I'm aware.

Largely through the whinging of previous Fediversalists.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.