It's sad that a bunch of idiots acting like this get to decide who is guilty and who is innocent.
In this case maybe he got lucky because they'd already heard of him and made their stupidity apparent straight away. But what if they hadn't? What if they only learnt about his drug pricing during the trial and then convicted him based on that?
Comments
It's sad that a bunch of idiots acting like this get to decide who is guilty and who is innocent.
In this case maybe he got lucky because they'd already heard of him and made their stupidity apparent straight away. But what if they hadn't? What if they only learnt about his drug pricing during the trial and then convicted him based on that?
That would have been an instant mistrial, since the charges had nothing to do with drug pricing.