The China Study (book) suggested that, almost universally, food from animals = bad, food from plants = good. I started reading it about a year ago and gave up a few chapters in because it came across as very selective in its facts, so I can't give the precise details.
The article (okay, I only read the summary at the end) suggests that, while the book has some legitimate points, much of it is very biased and selective reporting of the facts. Go figure.
tl;dr - Radical claims about nutrition are found to be somewhat exaggerated. Also, eating food causes cancer, so try not to do that.
(If anyone did actually read through the entire book and/or article, feel free to elaborate a bit)
Comments
The China Study (book) suggested that, almost universally, food from animals = bad, food from plants = good. I started reading it about a year ago and gave up a few chapters in because it came across as very selective in its facts, so I can't give the precise details.
The article (okay, I only read the summary at the end) suggests that, while the book has some legitimate points, much of it is very biased and selective reporting of the facts. Go figure.
tl;dr - Radical claims about nutrition are found to be somewhat exaggerated. Also, eating food causes cancer, so try not to do that.
(If anyone did actually read through the entire book and/or article, feel free to elaborate a bit)