can you cite any evidence from the article to support that claim? the closest thing i can see to that is this statement:
This is why “white separatism” is, in practice, just a rebranding of white supremacy; white separatists never seem to suggest that they should be the ones who should leave their homes and lives behind.
nothing about that implies "white-hating antifa marxist" to me at all. i don't think a strong distaste for white separatism implies hatred of white people, and conflating those viewpoints is highly disingenuous at best (but it seems much more likely to me to be an attempt at trolling, or white supremacist apologetics).
"I am unapologetically a Zionist. I believe that the Jews must have a state to exist safely in the world, and that it has the right to exist."
The implication is that Jews would be entitled to separatism because that's the only way they can be safe. Lets admit it is true. But how come, somehow, whites will always be safe and don't need a "white" country?
Pure hypocrisy.
Oh, and for the record, most Jews are "White" as far as my eye can tell.
But how come, somehow, whites will always be safe and don't need a "white" country?
Nobody is at war with us over our country's borders
Oh, and for the record, most Jews are "White" as far as my eye can tell.
A lot of people disagree, actually. In fact, "white" doesn't refer to skin color, but ethnicity. Hebrews are usually considered to be non-white because of their ethnicity ("Jew" is just a colloquialism and doesn't refer to their religion, but ethnicity).
A lot of people disagree with what my eye tells me?
OK. But I still can't distinguish. I have no clue if a person is Jewish or not from just looking at her, unless she's wearing something indicative.
As for people not being at war, even if that was the case now, who's to say it won't be in the future? It was in the past. The Ottoman went all the way to Vienna. The Umayyad conquered the Iberian Peninsula. The Mongol hordes reached central Europe.
I'm sorry, I understand the desire for separatism even if I don't totally agree with it; but to want it for oneself while calling other's "supremacy" is just hypocrisy.
A lot of people disagree with what my eye tells me?
Uhh, that's a straw man. What your eye tells you means jack, and it's also not what I said.
OK. But I still can't distinguish. I have no clue if a person is Jewish or not from just looking at her, unless she's wearing something indicative.
That's not how race works.
I'm sorry, I understand the desire for separatism even if I don't totally agree with it; but to want it for oneself while calling other's "supremacy" is just hypocrisy.
This isn't even a straw man. You just threw a bunch of straw on the floor and started yelling at it.
Comments
Ah yes, everyone left of Gee Dubya is a white-hating antifa marxist.
I didn't say that. But the author of this article certainly is.
can you cite any evidence from the article to support that claim? the closest thing i can see to that is this statement:
nothing about that implies "white-hating antifa marxist" to me at all. i don't think a strong distaste for white separatism implies hatred of white people, and conflating those viewpoints is highly disingenuous at best (but it seems much more likely to me to be an attempt at trolling, or white supremacist apologetics).
Implies "hypocrite" to me.
https://twitter.com/yonatanzunger/status/888906855044403200
"I am unapologetically a Zionist. I believe that the Jews must have a state to exist safely in the world, and that it has the right to exist."
The implication is that Jews would be entitled to separatism because that's the only way they can be safe. Lets admit it is true. But how come, somehow, whites will always be safe and don't need a "white" country?
Pure hypocrisy.
Oh, and for the record, most Jews are "White" as far as my eye can tell.
Nobody is at war with us over our country's borders
A lot of people disagree, actually. In fact, "white" doesn't refer to skin color, but ethnicity. Hebrews are usually considered to be non-white because of their ethnicity ("Jew" is just a colloquialism and doesn't refer to their religion, but ethnicity).
A lot of people disagree with what my eye tells me?
OK. But I still can't distinguish. I have no clue if a person is Jewish or not from just looking at her, unless she's wearing something indicative.
As for people not being at war, even if that was the case now, who's to say it won't be in the future? It was in the past. The Ottoman went all the way to Vienna. The Umayyad conquered the Iberian Peninsula. The Mongol hordes reached central Europe.
I'm sorry, I understand the desire for separatism even if I don't totally agree with it; but to want it for oneself while calling other's "supremacy" is just hypocrisy.
Uhh, that's a straw man. What your eye tells you means jack, and it's also not what I said.
That's not how race works.
This isn't even a straw man. You just threw a bunch of straw on the floor and started yelling at it.