Ah, that makes a lot of sense - I was trying to find information on how ultrasound machines worked awhile ago, and most of the information I found just said that a ceramic piezo is used to emit the sound and measure the time until it returned. I could not fathom at the time what kind of math must be required to get a 2D image out of a single data point like that, and I couldn't find much elaboration on the subject.
But if it's just a few hundred piezos in an array, now THAT makes a lot more sense.
It's not an array of piezos (or at least, not a one-per-column array of transducers). It's a phased array which they use to rapidly scan the volume, iirc something like 32 emitters and a single receiver in a commercial unit.
Source: I looked into building one last time we had a baby but didn't get around to it.
Yep. Array is the keyword that makes it easier to Google...phased arrays, curved arrays, etc. And of course, with a bunch of piezos, your signal processing problem is larger.
The point being that on these experiments, the sensor isn't an array of piezos, rather a single-element piezo. Cuts the costs (a fab invoices around 100-200e for such a sensor), but lowers the overall image quality.
Comments
Ah, that makes a lot of sense - I was trying to find information on how ultrasound machines worked awhile ago, and most of the information I found just said that a ceramic piezo is used to emit the sound and measure the time until it returned. I could not fathom at the time what kind of math must be required to get a 2D image out of a single data point like that, and I couldn't find much elaboration on the subject.
But if it's just a few hundred piezos in an array, now THAT makes a lot more sense.
It's not an array of piezos (or at least, not a one-per-column array of transducers). It's a phased array which they use to rapidly scan the volume, iirc something like 32 emitters and a single receiver in a commercial unit.
Source: I looked into building one last time we had a baby but didn't get around to it.
Yep. Array is the keyword that makes it easier to Google...phased arrays, curved arrays, etc. And of course, with a bunch of piezos, your signal processing problem is larger.
The point being that on these experiments, the sensor isn't an array of piezos, rather a single-element piezo. Cuts the costs (a fab invoices around 100-200e for such a sensor), but lowers the overall image quality.
I wonder if two sensors placed at a distance can make a huge difference, and how/if the image quality converges as you increase sensors.
One of the next experiment is to try with 8 small elements ;)