i'm sorry, what in my post made you think i wouldn't be happy with your solution ?
i would even be happy with no generic at all if basic types implemented low level interfaces, and let me code my containers against things like "sortable, equatable, hashable" ( although it may pose other problems).
Comments
i'm sorry, what in my post made you think i wouldn't be happy with your solution ?
i would even be happy with no generic at all if basic types implemented low level interfaces, and let me code my containers against things like "sortable, equatable, hashable" ( although it may pose other problems).
Well, It was more about strategy :) Sorry for the stupid analogy, but that's how I feel about the discussion:
A: I need a Ferrari to go to work. How is it hard to understand!
B: Well, you've only have 10 minute commute, a small car would do the work quite as well, as cost a lot less.
A: What made you think i wouldn't be happy with a smaller car?