In the bigger picture functional programming has made huge inroads. Facebook has a Haskell team whose product handles up to 1 million requests per second, and it's also in production at AT&T, Microsoft, Google, Barclays, New York Times and many smaller outfits. The other day I read about a Haskell-like language being used for high-speed, low-latency trading for a hedge fund.
But there are probably at least 100x more SQL developers out there.
Yea because almost all databases use SQL, and zillions of businesses use databases. FP is only a tiny subset of industry coding, but popular in academia and high profile companies.
There are by far more small companies using Haskell & FP than large ones. I mentioned large companies because they are recognizable. So what is your point?
Comments
I love Haskell, but... Haskell is about as popular as SQL? That makes no sense.
In real live people dont care about functional programming...
I believe that in your real life, they don't.
In the bigger picture functional programming has made huge inroads. Facebook has a Haskell team whose product handles up to 1 million requests per second, and it's also in production at AT&T, Microsoft, Google, Barclays, New York Times and many smaller outfits. The other day I read about a Haskell-like language being used for high-speed, low-latency trading for a hedge fund.
But there are probably at least 100x more SQL developers out there.
Yea because almost all databases use SQL, and zillions of businesses use databases. FP is only a tiny subset of industry coding, but popular in academia and high profile companies.
Because research teams at huge tech companies totally represent the "real life" of normal companies.
There are by far more small companies using Haskell & FP than large ones. I mentioned large companies because they are recognizable. So what is your point?
That's because functional programmers are living the dream.
I noticed that too, I like haskell, but I don't believe it.
SQL may be an outlier because not that many people refer to themselves as "programming in SQL".
Conversely, there are plenty of weekend Haskellers who enjoy discussing it whenever possible.
Is that how data works? "Oh it does not support my feelings so it must be wrong?!" Haskell is nice, granted, but not as popular as you might feel.
Pretty sure parent meant SQL is far more popular than Haskell, despite parent's love.
I thing GP might have implied the reverse. SQL is to databases what JavaScript is to the web.