yet another web framework medium article with a misleading angular vs react comparison.
it isn't angular 2 anymore. it's just angular. it's been out for over a year and if people were having problems running it in production, we would hear about it. there are many sites running angular 2-4 in production, google it and see for yourself. just because google didn't rewrite gmail in angular doesn't mean you shouldn't use it.
I wonder if there is some highly ranked google search result that spreads this misinformation, months after some of these points were valid.
Every framework is going to have flaws, but if you perform a comparison I think there's a responsibility to accurately represent the frameworks being compared.
Comments
yet another web framework medium article with a misleading angular vs react comparison.
it isn't angular 2 anymore. it's just angular. it's been out for over a year and if people were having problems running it in production, we would hear about it. there are many sites running angular 2-4 in production, google it and see for yourself. just because google didn't rewrite gmail in angular doesn't mean you shouldn't use it.
I wonder if there is some highly ranked google search result that spreads this misinformation, months after some of these points were valid.
I run latest angular, works pretty good. We even got some support from google angular team itself - it's amazing.
Not fan of angular or any other framework in particular but this gets the job done so far. If only they finish angular universal faster..
I guess what the author meant is that when they started their project, Angular 2 was still not production stuff.
The pop culture cuts both ways it seems.
Every framework is going to have flaws, but if you perform a comparison I think there's a responsibility to accurately represent the frameworks being compared.