Using pictures unlawfully is sadly the trend on internet forums and to a large degree on big blogs. This is particularly prevalent when it comes to videogame magazines which are scanned and uploaded and is either showed on the videogame-related site or referenced by a link. Everyone basically does it. It's ridiculous and appalling.
Add to this sites like reddit who, willy-nilly, deep-link to images on other sites with few if any moral qualms. Hotlink/Deep-link protection is something you ought to make sure you implement. The comic artist The Oatmeal chose to split up his images so they couldn't be exploited effectively.
Can you expound on that? I was under the impression (from some discussion about electronic search-and-seizure laws) that mail, once delivered to the recipient, is no longer considered your property. I guess I've never reflected on exactly what property rights are transfered to me when you mail me something. Certainly if you send me something in a physical envelope, I can forward that to anyone, copyright law has nothing to do with that. So the question is whether electronic mail shares that feature with physical mail, since mail service is something that's explicitly talked about in the law.
> I was under the impression (from some discussion about electronic search-and-seizure laws) that mail, once delivered to the recipient, is no longer considered your property.
While true, owning a piece of mail does not imply that you own the relevant copyright.
Consider a book that you own. You own that copy. You can destroy it, you can sell/give/lend/show it to someone else, you can keep it. That physical thing is yours do do with as you will.
However, you can't (legally) copy it if its copyright is still active. (Yes, fair use comes in here too.)
You are incorrect. The author of a letter retains the copyright to the contents. The recipient owns their copy, but cannot duplicate it without permission.
I think that that is a more ingrained issue. Nobody would think twice about running a snail mail letter through the copy machine and forwarding a copy to someone else either. No internet needed.
Maybe game magazines aren't the best example given their habit of whoring out good reviews in exchange for "exclusives" which mostly contain marketing material. Hardly bastions of creativity.
Comments
Using pictures unlawfully is sadly the trend on internet forums and to a large degree on big blogs. This is particularly prevalent when it comes to videogame magazines which are scanned and uploaded and is either showed on the videogame-related site or referenced by a link. Everyone basically does it. It's ridiculous and appalling.
Add to this sites like reddit who, willy-nilly, deep-link to images on other sites with few if any moral qualms. Hotlink/Deep-link protection is something you ought to make sure you implement. The comic artist The Oatmeal chose to split up his images so they couldn't be exploited effectively.
What about e-mail forwarding? That's just as illegal as copying a picture, and everybody BAR NONE does it without a second thought.
Can you expound on that? I was under the impression (from some discussion about electronic search-and-seizure laws) that mail, once delivered to the recipient, is no longer considered your property. I guess I've never reflected on exactly what property rights are transfered to me when you mail me something. Certainly if you send me something in a physical envelope, I can forward that to anyone, copyright law has nothing to do with that. So the question is whether electronic mail shares that feature with physical mail, since mail service is something that's explicitly talked about in the law.
> I was under the impression (from some discussion about electronic search-and-seizure laws) that mail, once delivered to the recipient, is no longer considered your property.
While true, owning a piece of mail does not imply that you own the relevant copyright.
Consider a book that you own. You own that copy. You can destroy it, you can sell/give/lend/show it to someone else, you can keep it. That physical thing is yours do do with as you will.
However, you can't (legally) copy it if its copyright is still active. (Yes, fair use comes in here too.)
Physical and electronic mail is exactly the same.
You are incorrect. The author of a letter retains the copyright to the contents. The recipient owns their copy, but cannot duplicate it without permission.
I think that that is a more ingrained issue. Nobody would think twice about running a snail mail letter through the copy machine and forwarding a copy to someone else either. No internet needed.
Maybe game magazines aren't the best example given their habit of whoring out good reviews in exchange for "exclusives" which mostly contain marketing material. Hardly bastions of creativity.