Comment on Base65536 encodingparentComments−piaste9yFor raw packets obviously not, but if:- you're sending big byte arrays over json/xml- you cannot switch to a more efficient medium- (but you can make your remote counterpart adopt a different encoding)- and you still need to maximize your throughputthen I guess you might consider base85 for utf-8 or base32k for utf-16?−jbg_9yJSON is UTF-8 by definition, so at best you'd be using a format that looked similar.
Comments
For raw packets obviously not, but if:
- you're sending big byte arrays over json/xml
- you cannot switch to a more efficient medium
- (but you can make your remote counterpart adopt a different encoding)
- and you still need to maximize your throughput
then I guess you might consider base85 for utf-8 or base32k for utf-16?
JSON is UTF-8 by definition, so at best you'd be using a format that looked similar.