Skip to content

Comment on Nifty Freeway Interchange Designparent

Comments

I have a sort of visceral negative reaction to roundabouts, but I think because most of the ones I've seen in Europe, when the road is more than one lane wide in each direction, seem to end up with a crazy ad-hoc-lanes thing going on in them, where it's as if you drove onto a huge plaza with no lane markings, where everyone is driving in all sorts of criss-crossing diagonal directions trying to get from their entrance road to their exit road across multiple lanes of traffic. I imagine some countries have more orderly versions, but that's how the Paris ones all felt to me.

edit: video of an example, around the Arc de Triomphe -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lay8aZlsbB0

I approve of one-lane roundabouts and wish America would replace all its four-way stop signs with them. Four-way stop signs make no sense and just make everything painful, especially for cyclists.

Two-lane roundabouts are pretty dangerous, though -- while I've never had an accident in one I've always suspected that I might. And anything more than two just seems to be crazy.

Well, the Arc de Triomphe is not exactly a /good/ example.

Your point is valid, but I (and others more qualified) argued this ends up being safer. People's mental model changes when they get to a roundabout, they sort of switch on their brain a bit more. I have in my head, but can't find a reference, that roundabouts are actually surprisingly safe.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.