Skip to content

Comment on Amazon Strategy Teardownparent

Comments

I couldn't disagree more. The entirety of the internet runs on AWS. The rest is an inconsequential rounding error.

Google has more machine learning relevant data

Subjective. Relevant to what?

______________

It has a strong brand image as "THE company for AI "

AI is so early there's isn't a recognized brand yet. Maybe to the HN crowd, but that's astronomically small in the grand scheme of things.

______________

It has (at this point in time at least) better machine learning hardware. This will change in the near future, but Google is far more likely to take a competitor in this area seriously and acquire them.

Competing on commodities? Doesn't seem likely.

______________

Google has not one, but two (Deep mind and brain) world class research labs.

Again. Doesn't seem like much of an upper hand.

______________

Google's ML APIs are objectively better.

AWS doesn't need better APIs or Developer UX. That's not what this is about.

The entirety of the internet runs on AWS. The rest is an inconsequential rounding error.

None of the top 5 Alexa websites [1] (Google, YouTube, Facebook, Baidu and Wikipedia) run on AWS as far as I know. I'm not sure what rounding mode you're using.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_popular_websites

Ha. DL hardware != a commodity

Pretty sure having two of the premier DL labs is an upper hand in deep learning...

Well then what on earth does Amazon offer that's different from Google?

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.