When the police act as though cameras were the equivalent of guns pointed at them, there is a sense in which they are correct
I've never heard of a policeman acting as though a camera was the equivalent of a gun. If you disagree, try pointing an actual gun at an armed policeman and see what happens.
These anti-camera laws are stupid, but the analogy to guns is silly. A better analogy would be "are cameras the new penises", because pointing one of those at a policeman will get you cautioned and possibly arrested but not shot.
The analogy holds in terms of harm. Point a gun at them and they might end up in the hospital or morgue. Point a camera at them and they might end up in jail. Point a penis at them and they will come to no direct harm if they ignore it; they might get sanctioned for not stopping a disturbance of the peace, but that's a very different thing than the other three outcomes.
Comments
When the police act as though cameras were the equivalent of guns pointed at them, there is a sense in which they are correct
I've never heard of a policeman acting as though a camera was the equivalent of a gun. If you disagree, try pointing an actual gun at an armed policeman and see what happens.
These anti-camera laws are stupid, but the analogy to guns is silly. A better analogy would be "are cameras the new penises", because pointing one of those at a policeman will get you cautioned and possibly arrested but not shot.
The analogy holds in terms of harm. Point a gun at them and they might end up in the hospital or morgue. Point a camera at them and they might end up in jail. Point a penis at them and they will come to no direct harm if they ignore it; they might get sanctioned for not stopping a disturbance of the peace, but that's a very different thing than the other three outcomes.