Skip to content

Comment on You Don't Get AMPparent

Comments

Good examples, but none of that is anything that I want. I'd much prefer small, simple, static pages to any of that. Additionally, they will load faster, and be easier to read. Those things are just trimming pages down to what Google wants, not users.

As somebody who has implemented AMP for a major newspaper, these are in fact things that publishers want.

Adding shit because publishers want them is how things got so bloated in the first place. If it weren't for that we wouldn't need AMP.

And as a user: IDGAF what publishers want. Sorry, they had their chance and blew it. And this is the problem: Publishers increasingly are ignoring what their users want. Instead of providing quality products, they keep circling the drain to get the lowest-quality content. GLWT

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.