The article at first suggests that more intelligent versions of AI led to greed and sabotage.

But I do wonder if an even more intelligent AI (perhaps in a more complex environment) would take the long view instead and find a reason to co-habitate.

It's kind of like rocks, paper scissors - when you attempt to think several levels deeper than your opponent and guess which level they stopped at. At some intelligence level for AI, cohabitation seems optimal - at the next level, not so much, and so on.

We're probably going to end up building something so complex that we don't quite understand it and end up hurting somebody.