I have two projects on the go right now.
Both have gone the web sockets first approach.
I love it.
For me, the project I keep rebuilding to learn new languages/frameworks is Risk (though it's been quite awhile now).
After spending so much time with Phoenix channels on my main project, I couldn't resist the fun of reimplementing it over sockets. It'll probably wind up on GitHub when I'm done.
But isn't channels the Phoenix abstraction (middleware) for websockets/sockets per se?
What I mean is why not write a sockets Phoenix channels transports adapter to be used instead of the default one & continue using the existing codebase? :)
Sorry! Reading my comment back, it's no wonder it was tough to follow.
Instead of writing: "I couldn't resist the fun of reimplementing it over sockets."
I should have wrote: "I couldn't resist building another version of Risk with Phoenix/channels/sockets because it should be mind-meltingly easier compared to all of the previous times I'd built it on other platforms"
Comments
I have two projects on the go right now. Both have gone the web sockets first approach. I love it.
For me, the project I keep rebuilding to learn new languages/frameworks is Risk (though it's been quite awhile now).
After spending so much time with Phoenix channels on my main project, I couldn't resist the fun of reimplementing it over sockets. It'll probably wind up on GitHub when I'm done.
But isn't channels the Phoenix abstraction (middleware) for websockets/sockets per se?
What I mean is why not write a sockets Phoenix channels transports adapter to be used instead of the default one & continue using the existing codebase? :)
Sorry! Reading my comment back, it's no wonder it was tough to follow.
Instead of writing: "I couldn't resist the fun of reimplementing it over sockets."
I should have wrote: "I couldn't resist building another version of Risk with Phoenix/channels/sockets because it should be mind-meltingly easier compared to all of the previous times I'd built it on other platforms"
I assume the OP is talking about reimplementing the channels client. Though now I'm not sure.