I wouldn't say that's what most people mean by parallel, but in that case I think you're better off building a layer on top of the compiler for that.
For instance, provided deterministic compilation you could keep a networked cache of compiled libraries that would be delivered as needed.
Trying to be network-parallel at any finer level is probably a waste of time -- network and (de)serialization overhead would eat away all the advantages.
Comments
"It depends on what you mean by parallel."
Across different machines, not cores on ^a^ chip?
I wouldn't say that's what most people mean by parallel, but in that case I think you're better off building a layer on top of the compiler for that.
For instance, provided deterministic compilation you could keep a networked cache of compiled libraries that would be delivered as needed.
Trying to be network-parallel at any finer level is probably a waste of time -- network and (de)serialization overhead would eat away all the advantages.