1) As the blog post says, it's optional, so if you like the traditional interface, you can still use it.
2) Regarding "investing in", it's a free and open source community-driven project. The community decides what to work on. If you think the community should "invest" in something else, please feel free to join the community :-)
1. It's optional, but its existence increases the testing burden for all other parts of the application, because now there are more options to test. See here:
2. Communities, like individuals, sometimes make mistakes. It's OK to voice ones opinion that a mistake is a mistake. And they are free to ignore me if they disagree.
Comments
1) As the blog post says, it's optional, so if you like the traditional interface, you can still use it.
2) Regarding "investing in", it's a free and open source community-driven project. The community decides what to work on. If you think the community should "invest" in something else, please feel free to join the community :-)
1. It's optional, but its existence increases the testing burden for all other parts of the application, because now there are more options to test. See here:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2002-Apri...
2. Communities, like individuals, sometimes make mistakes. It's OK to voice ones opinion that a mistake is a mistake. And they are free to ignore me if they disagree.