I'm not quite sure the author justified tacking 'And Why Microsoft's Still Evil' onto the title. I suppose one could make the argument that 'soulless company' (author's words) equates to 'evil', but if that's the case, then the author should have spent some time arguing why Microsoft is soulless (instead of simply asserting it as a universal truth). As it's written, everything after the ellipses in the title feels more like link-bate than a genuine representation of the posting.