His point seems to be that nothing fundamental has changed except for people's expectations. People being slightly more odiferous has never been a showstopper before.
And you say it's unhygenic... there's nothing dangerous about not showering daily. It's purely an aesthetic thing. I do it for that reason, but I don't kid myself about its necessity.
Comments
now !== then
His point seems to be that nothing fundamental has changed except for people's expectations. People being slightly more odiferous has never been a showstopper before.
And you say it's unhygenic... there's nothing dangerous about not showering daily. It's purely an aesthetic thing. I do it for that reason, but I don't kid myself about its necessity.
Fundamentally, people's expectations have changed. Context, as always, is king.
Which language uses !== instead of != ?
PHP. The !== checks for equality and for type. For example, it is true in PHP that 0 == false, but it is also true that 0 !== false.
Also Javascript: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Core_JavaScript_1.5_Referen...
Correct.
But given that now and then are both of type Temporal, he should still go for !=.
There are coding style guides that advocate using the strict operators everywhere it makes sense. http://javascript.crockford.com/code.html
Ah, sorry, I read it as "equality of type".
It's strict not equal in JavaScript. 'Returns true if the operands are not equal and/or not of the same type.'
.
'==' and '!=' are coercive in JavaScript -- as in: