Of course employers influence job hopping. The impression I get everywhere is that bad employers outnumber good ones by far (too much to be attributed to selection bias). The prevalence of job hoppers is probably more of an indictment of these employers rather than the job seeker.
"Good" places to work like the one Suster purports to run can probably afford to filter out a lot of false negatives from job hopping behavior. Fine, whatever. Your loss. But don't expect people to take that advice at face value.
You might also claim that good employees should also know better than to steer clear of these bad employers, but these people also have to eat, too.
right...mark did not touch on the topic of toxic workplaces. he focused solely (i guess) on these "good" or "utopian" work situations. that was another catalyst for the post.
however, in his latest blog post, mark addresses these issues. so i definitely credit him there.
Comments
Of course employers influence job hopping. The impression I get everywhere is that bad employers outnumber good ones by far (too much to be attributed to selection bias). The prevalence of job hoppers is probably more of an indictment of these employers rather than the job seeker.
"Good" places to work like the one Suster purports to run can probably afford to filter out a lot of false negatives from job hopping behavior. Fine, whatever. Your loss. But don't expect people to take that advice at face value.
You might also claim that good employees should also know better than to steer clear of these bad employers, but these people also have to eat, too.
right...mark did not touch on the topic of toxic workplaces. he focused solely (i guess) on these "good" or "utopian" work situations. that was another catalyst for the post.
however, in his latest blog post, mark addresses these issues. so i definitely credit him there.