Comment on Trump Picks Top Climate Skeptic to Lead EPA TransitionparentComments−helthanatos9yMaybe it's because climate change is caused by something other than our cars.−gopetergo9yYou can fact check this in 5 seconds, but it looks like the average sceptic is not even able to achieve that simple task.https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emis...−c0nducktr9yFunny how many people in tech think because they're good with computers they're somehow smarter than climate scientists.−CamperBob29yNo, it's just that no one understands the failings of computer models better than we do.−peterashford9yWhat are your climate science credentials?−darpa_escapee9yHas an opinion and works with computers.−ocschwar9yMaybe you should offer more than a tantalizing hint for why we should discount 150 years of scientific work establishing that it is, in fact, caused by our cars.−fl0wenol9yYou're right!It's also caused by, but to a significantly lesser extent, raising cattle.(Deforestation and methane release)−thatcat9yLike what? All the farts of relief by trump supporters accumulating in a thick boundary layer of smug?
Comments
Maybe it's because climate change is caused by something other than our cars.
You can fact check this in 5 seconds, but it looks like the average sceptic is not even able to achieve that simple task.
https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emis...
Funny how many people in tech think because they're good with computers they're somehow smarter than climate scientists.
No, it's just that no one understands the failings of computer models better than we do.
What are your climate science credentials?
Has an opinion and works with computers.
Maybe you should offer more than a tantalizing hint for why we should discount 150 years of scientific work establishing that it is, in fact, caused by our cars.
You're right!
It's also caused by, but to a significantly lesser extent, raising cattle.
(Deforestation and methane release)
Like what? All the farts of relief by trump supporters accumulating in a thick boundary layer of smug?