Well, any code that was built on top of GPLed code needs not to be closed source, in order to comply with the license that they accessed the code under.
No disagreement there. Mathnerd314 asked for proof of stolen code, which of course is difficult to provide when we're talking about a closed source product. So the original authors must resort to indirect proof like comparing visuals and inspecting the binary.
Comments
How should he show code when the Wix app is closed source?
His post mentions "icons, class names, even bugs". That seems damning (just ripping icons would be a copyright violation on its own).
Well, any code that was built on top of GPLed code needs not to be closed source, in order to comply with the license that they accessed the code under.
No disagreement there. Mathnerd314 asked for proof of stolen code, which of course is difficult to provide when we're talking about a closed source product. So the original authors must resort to indirect proof like comparing visuals and inspecting the binary.