Comment on Gizmodo paid $10,000 for "lost" iPhone 4GparentComments−InclinedPlane16yIt was not information. It was a physical object that belonged to somebody else. Beyond that it was intellectual property that belonged to somebody else. Gizmodo is morally indefensible here, I think.
Comments
It was not information. It was a physical object that belonged to somebody else. Beyond that it was intellectual property that belonged to somebody else. Gizmodo is morally indefensible here, I think.